Universal screening in reading is important, but inaccurate and costly approaches are not worth investing in. Paly and colleagues recently conducted a retrospective research project to analyze four approaches to reading risk screening in terms of their accuracy and costs, including the prior-year state test (STAAR Reading), the aimswebPlus, and two approaches using both tests in different ways.
Sensibly distribute resources: Prior-year statewide achievement test data is sufficient
Publication Source