Collaborative overreach: why collaboration probably isn’t key to the next phase of school reform
EdCentral community rating

Add to my reading list
Author(s):
James Croft

Croft states that school-to-school collaboration is often seen as an important factor in improving pupil performance within the school system. However, he argues, most research in support of collaboration has been ‘dogged’ by poor methodology, is qualitative and tends to focus on staff development, rather than quantifiable student outcomes.

He believes there is a danger that collaboration is seen as an end goal, regardless of the educational merit, and that proponents of collaboration often confuse chain and federation effects with collaboration effects, which are different.

Croft claims that more verifiable research suggests that federation arrangements deliberately designed to improving pupil attainment, and which have organised themselves to deliver, are likely to be more impactful than collaborative efforts. 

 






In listing research, EdCentral makes no judgment or recommendation as to its quality, validity or methodology and none should be inferred. Through peer ratings left by education practitioners, EdCentral’s aim is to support the development of a repository of shared knowledge and experience.

*   Please note that your reading list can only be saved permanently if you are logged into your account.


Author(s):
James Croft

Published by:
Centre for the Study of Market Reform of Education (CMRE)

Date of publication:
October 2015

Country of origin:
UK

CPD opportunities:

Arguing the need for good research with sound methodology that shows collaboration working effectively to improve pupil outcomes, this paper will interest policy markers and educators working in collaborative arrangements. 


£:

Record ID:
R209 / 124
Rating Summary:


0 based on 0 votes





Start a discussion



Back to search results   |   New search   |   View my reading list   |   Print this page

EdCentral Logo