Academies and maintained schools: oversight and intervention
EdCentral community rating

Add to my reading list
National Audit Office (NAO)

According to this report the Department for Education has now demonstrated the effectiveness its interventions in underperforming schools and academies, despite investing roughly £380m annually into monitoring and improvement.

It found that the DfE relies heavily on sponsors to turn around underperforming schools, but does not collect information from them about the type of support they give. Ofsted is unable to inspect sponsors and multi-academy trusts so there is no independent source of information about the quality of their work.

The report states that there are significant gaps in the Department’s understanding of what works, and the information it has about important aspects of school performance is limited. In order to address this, the authors suggest that greater school autonomy needs to be coupled with effective oversight and assurance. 

In listing research, EdCentral makes no judgment or recommendation as to its quality, validity or methodology and none should be inferred. Through peer ratings left by education practitioners, EdCentral’s aim is to support the development of a repository of shared knowledge and experience.

*   Please note that your reading list can only be saved permanently if you are logged into your account.

National Audit Office (NAO)

Published by:
National Audit Office (NAO)

Date of publication:
October 2014

Country of origin:

CPD opportunities:

Finding the DfE’s oversight of academy and maintained schools to be lacking, this report may interest policy makers. 


Record ID:
R214 / 144
Rating Summary:

0 based on 0 votes

Start a discussion

Back to search results   |   New search   |   View my reading list   |   Print this page

EdCentral Logo