Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine)
EdCentral community rating

Add to my reading list
Author(s):
Professor Douglas Carnine

This report by Professor Douglas Carnine explains why education experts tend to ignore research-based practices and instead embrace constructivist methods that are not backed by good research. Carnine writes that a defining feature of a 'mature profession', such medicine or the law, is a willingness to engage with research findings and that in order to improve education needs to be more open to evidence-based change.

The first section of this essay provides examples from reading and mathematics curricula that show education experts dispensing unproven methods and flitting from one fad to another. The following sections show how public impatience has forced other professions to 'grow up' and accept accountability and scientific evidence. The paper concludes with a plea to develop education into a mature, evidence-based profession.






In listing research, EdCentral makes no judgment or recommendation as to its quality, validity or methodology and none should be inferred. Through peer ratings left by education practitioners, EdCentral’s aim is to support the development of a repository of shared knowledge and experience.

*   Please note that your reading list can only be saved permanently if you are logged into your account.


Author(s):
Professor Douglas Carnine

Published by:
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation

Date of publication:
2000

Country of origin:
US

CPD opportunities:

This report will be particularly useful for policy makers looking for background research on the benefits of evidence-based practice in education. 


£:

Record ID:
R090 / 244
Rating Summary:


0 based on 0 votes





Start a discussion



Back to search results   |   New search   |   View my reading list   |   Print this page

EdCentral Logo